Re: Clitic Doubling

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Luis Gonzalez (lgonzale@email.unc.edu)
Thu, 10 Jul 1997 13:16:28 -0400


Paola Monachesi wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I don't think Paola's work actually deals with either of > > these phenomena, and I'm not aware of any work in HPSG that does. > > Chris is right, my thesis doesn't deal with these phenomena. However, > there is a paper by A. Sanfilippo in the forthcoming CSLI book "Romance > in HPSG" that deals with Clitic left dislocation in Italian. I also > know of a draft paper on Romanian clitic doubling by Ana Maria Barbu > and Emil Ionescu (abarbu@valhalla.racai.ro). I have also something very > sketchy on Romanian clitic doubling in a "semi-draft" paper. > > > I think it is fairly straightforward to see how c.1995 accounts of clitics > > in HPSG could be extended to doubling (that is accounts in terms of > > `argument composition' -- i.e., division categories -- implemented via > > lexical rules). One would propose a rule such as this: > > > > [ verb ] [ COMPS L1 + <[1]> + L2 ] > > [ COMPS L1 + <[1] [CASE dat]> + L2 ] ==> [ CLTS W U {[1]} ] > > [ CLTS W ] > > > > I share Chris intuition that it should be simple to extend the c.1995 > accounts to handle clitic doubling. However, his lexical rule should > be more complicated; it would be appropriate if clitics in Romanian > or Spanish were real agreement markers, but they are not quite. > One would need to restrict the application of the rule since there are > certain semantic and pragmatic restrictions on which kind of complements > can be doubled by clitics. > > Ciao, > > Paola Hello, I have not worked out any details of the formalism, but I discuss in some detail clitic doubling--dative as well as accusative--in my dissertation (1997, abstract available in the this list's dissertation abstracts). I use Spanish to propose an analysis that shows when clitic doubling is obligatory, when it is optional and why the optional rule is applied more often than not. As the title of the dissertation suggests, case marking becomes predictable for psych verbs. The dissertation was filed in March, but I do not know if it is already available through University Microfilm International. If some people are interested in looking at the chapter on clitic doubling, please contact me to try to arrange something. Best regards, Luis Gonzalez University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill lgonzale@email.unc.edu


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Dec 18 1998 - 20:36:08 PST